Become A Member | Forum | Profiles | Personals | Classifieds | See Who's Online ...
 
View Topic
  Message Boards : Activism / Politics : View Topic : 15 Posts, Page 1 of 1
  HomeNewNoticesHot TopicsPollsStatsBlogs Login / Register
 
UN, Should It Be Re-homed Too A New Location?
 
# 1 : Saturday 30-12-2017 @ 19:26
 
 
Do you think the UN, should be moved out of the US and too a new Country. Any thoughts on this, or anything to do with the UN as it is today?
Reply
 
 Recent Message Board Topics
Rant Thread 7
Whats For Dinner Tonight? Part 4.
Celebrity Big Brother 2018
Brexit
Ireland's Abortion Referendum 2018
Good News Thread
President Trump / Oompa Loompa News
Can We Cope With Weather?
 
Hey! If you enjoy shooting the breeze with like-minded people, check out
our Message Boards
• Advice • Coming Out
• Computers • Current Affairs
• Discussion • Food & Drink
• Going Out • Humour
• Health • Music
• Newbies • Sexual Issues
# 2 : Saturday 30-12-2017 @ 21:21
 
 
No I don't!
Reply
 
# 3 : Saturday 30-12-2017 @ 23:15
 
 
What's the point? It would be waste of money. Americans allow all members to attend even countries America has no diplomatic relations with such as North Korea.
Reply
 
# 4 : Sunday 31-12-2017 @ 16:09
 
 
Looks like Russia, has been supplying NKRP with Oil also and the UN sanctions being ignored?
Reply
 
# 5 : Sunday 31-12-2017 @ 17:25
 
 
I don't see the point in the UN relocating. Trump may be antagonistic to the UN while he is in office, but the UN has lasted for 70 years and has seen many US Presidents come and go, some friendly towards the organisation, others less so.

Plus it would be a colossal waste of money. The UN wastes enough money as it is.
Reply
 
# 6 : Sunday 31-12-2017 @ 21:48
 
 
Do you think it needs, reforming if not re-homing and can or should it happen?
Reply
 
# 7 : Sunday 31-12-2017 @ 22:16
 
 
The security council needs an overhaul, Russia and China have been protecting their scummy friends around the World for too long.
Reply
 
# 8 : Sunday 31-12-2017 @ 23:20
 
 
Reply
 
# 9 : Monday 1-1-2018 @ 07:11
 
 
If they moved it would have to be to a non aligned country so it would take a long time to pick one , the security council will have to be reformed and probably many of the countries there will have to lose their seats and it will have to more realistically represent the present day and they will have to lose their veto.
The US china and Russia have all vetoed anything that hasn't suited their or their proxies agendas .
Reply
 
# 10 : Monday 1-1-2018 @ 15:19
 
 
Ireland?
Reply
 
# 11 : Monday 1-1-2018 @ 16:25
 
 
Someone said :
Ireland?

In Cobh, or Belfast then, not Dublin: it could not handle it!
Reply
 
# 12 : Tuesday 2-1-2018 @ 09:24
 
 
Just needs an airport so Knock or Shannon would work
Reply
 
# 13 : Tuesday 2-1-2018 @ 12:34
 
 
And security, and higher-end accommodation and facilities, and international schools, and secured communications, etc.
Reply
 
# 14 : Thursday 4-1-2018 @ 01:43
 
 
By gigory i've got it..!! Crimea.. the UN have been very effective there in the past..
Reply
 
# 15 : Thursday 4-1-2018 @ 15:19
 
 
Lebanon
Reply
 
Prev 1Next