That article is way too late, sensationalised and pretty awful.
She clearly hasn't much of a clue what she's on about.
If she thinks that Rory "lashed out", she's in for a massive shock if someone ever lashes out at her. John Waters does have a right to defend himself, but when the evidence is stacked against you, you need to back down.
Old people fearing for the children because they didn't fear for them in the past is a ridiculous point to make, we have far better systems now than just handing off kids to the industrial schools and laundries back then.
And the Bishops of the Catholic Church just wrote about why marriage equality shouldn't happen.
The homophobe/bigot debate died down month's ago, so I'm not sure if she's trying to stir it up again.
The only point in will concede on is the use of the word bigot, you can't live in a democracy and call anyone who disagrees with you a bigot. Right or wrong, when it's a two sided debate, both sides need air time.