There's something very funny about this hospital contract, if bam tendered 600million let's say and then their costs went to 1.2billion, why do we taxpayers have to pay? Surely our lawyers put in the contract that cost overruns would be borne by the contractor?
We (taxpayers) throw money hand over fist at these accountant firms like Pwc that incredibly are allowed to advise bam yet at the same time ate paid half a million of tax payers money to tell the government how taxpayers money was overspent ?????
Hello wake up half a million euro - who knows who
Does this government have no clue what a clause in s contract is or what kind of clauses lawyers can put in contracts or what kind of clawbacks lawyers can get back from contractors.
Why are they behaving like the money is gone?
Where are their legal team?